Hardware Detection and Validation

Stefano Cacciatore

2026-10-14

gpuinfo detects CPU and GPU hardware and reports whether local compute backends appear usable. Detection is framework-independent: a positive result does not imply that torch, TensorFlow, or another package was compiled with that backend.

Quick check on the current computer

library(gpuinfo)

has_gpu()
has_cuda()
has_metal()
has_rocm()
has_opencl()

hardware_info()
gpu_sitrep()

CPU and RAM are available independently of GPU backends:

cpu_info()
system_memory_info()
hardware_info()$gpu_summary

available_cores and effective-memory fields account for detectable process, container, and scheduler limits. They remain separate from host totals. A multi-GPU flag means multiple devices are visible; it does not prove that another R package can distribute work across them.

All probes are defensive. Missing hardware, commands, drivers, or libraries produce FALSE, empty results, or NA fields instead of an installation or runtime error. Detailed backend information distinguishes available, unavailable, and unknown; convenience predicates only return TRUE for a confirmed usable backend.

Benchmark memory and manifests

Version 0.2.0 separates device-wide memory from process-level memory:

device_memory <- gpu_memory_info()
before <- gpu_memory_sample()

# Run GPU work here. Synchronize with the framework before sampling if the
# operation is asynchronous.

after <- gpu_memory_sample()
manifest <- hardware_manifest(memory = "process")

# For worker-based benchmarks, collect several snapshots and aggregate them.
devices <- subset(gpu_devices(), process_visible)
peak <- gpu_memory_peak(list(before, after), devices)

gpu_memory_info() reports the device-wide total, used, and free values that the available system probe exposes. gpu_memory_sample() instead produces one timestamped row per process-visible device. Repeated calls can be combined into a benchmark time series; the function does not run a background thread and does not force asynchronous GPU work to finish.

For CUDA, memory is the value in nvidia-smi’s compute-process table for the requested PID, reconciled to the CUDA-visible device by UUID. It is current, driver-attributed allocation rather than a peak. Windows WDDM drivers may not expose it, in which case the result is NA with a reason code. A successful query with no row for the process is zero bytes and not_active.

gpu_memory_peak() groups rows by UUID, sums worker processes within each sampling instant, and returns the largest complete observed sum per expected device. It never reconciles by logical or physical device number. Missing or incomplete devices remain NA with status unmeasured, rather than being interpreted as zero. The result is sampling-dependent and is not a lifetime high-water mark maintained by the driver.

For Metal, memory is MTLDevice.currentAllocatedSize for the current R process. It measures current Metal resource allocations, not resident memory, peak memory, total unified memory, or allocations by other processes. The Metal API used here cannot inspect an arbitrary PID. Unsupported measurements remain NA; gpuinfo never estimates them from total memory.

hardware_manifest() packages CPU topology, host/effective RAM, process-visible devices, CUDA driver, runtime, Toolkit and compiler state, optional NCCL library/version information, other generic backends, measurement rules, and an optional memory sample into a schema-versioned list or JSON record.

The consolidated cuda_libraries() table reports whether the current process can dynamically load the CUDA driver, runtime, cuBLAS, cuFFT, cuSOLVER, cuRAND, and NCCL. Loading is a discovery check, not an execution test: no BLAS handle, FFT plan, solver, random generator, or NCCL communicator is created. Higher level dependencies such as cuVS and RAFT remain consumer-package checks.

nccl_info() is deliberately a lightweight discovery probe. It loads the shared library and calls ncclGetVersion() when available, but never creates a communicator. Its CUDA device count describes process visibility only; it is not evidence that collective communication works.

Evidence shipped with this release

Real-device results are stored with the package and returned inside hardware_info(). The table is intentionally narrower than the implemented probe set.

library(gpuinfo)
hardware_info()$validation
#>    package_version       date                                      os
#> 1            0.1.0 2026-09-05                              macOS 14.5
#> 2            0.1.0 2026-09-05                              macOS 14.5
#> 3            0.1.0 2026-09-05 Linux 6.12.100 / Ubuntu 22.04 container
#> 4            0.1.0 2026-09-05 Linux 6.12.100 / Ubuntu 22.04 container
#> 5            0.1.0 2026-09-05                            Ubuntu 24.04
#> 6            0.2.0 2026-10-10                              macOS 14.5
#> 7            0.2.0 2026-10-10                              macOS 14.5
#> 8            0.2.0 2026-10-10                              macOS 14.5
#> 9            0.2.0 2026-10-10                          Ubuntu 22.04.5
#> 10           0.2.0 2026-10-10                          Ubuntu 22.04.5
#>    architecture                      hardware backend result
#> 1         arm64                      Apple M3   metal   pass
#> 2         arm64                      Apple M3     cpu   pass
#> 3        x86_64               NVIDIA Tesla T4    cuda   pass
#> 4        x86_64               NVIDIA Tesla T4  opencl   pass
#> 5         arm64    GitHub-hosted ARM64 runner     cpu   pass
#> 6         arm64                      Apple M3     cpu   pass
#> 7         arm64                      Apple M3   metal   pass
#> 8         arm64                      Apple M3  opencl   pass
#> 9        x86_64    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti    cuda   pass
#> 10       x86_64 Intel Corporation Device a780  opencl   pass
#>                                                                                 scope
#> 1                                                         native probe and public API
#> 2                                                   cpu model core count and fallback
#> 3        native driver device memory capability runtime toolkit and backend selection
#> 4             native OpenCL enumeration and CUDA OpenCL physical device deduplication
#> 5                                 source install native compilation and package tests
#> 6                                 CPU topology host RAM effective RAM and process RSS
#> 7                                native device process memory manifest and public API
#> 8                              native OpenCL platform and compute-device availability
#> 9  driver runtime CUDA 13 Toolkit nvcc compute capability 12.0 sm_120 and compute_120
#> 10                 OpenCL enumeration and vendor classification alongside NVIDIA CUDA

The real-device evidence for the version 0.2.0 candidate covers:

Linux ARM64 validates the CPU path and native package compilation. Hosted Linux, Windows, Intel macOS, and Apple Silicon macOS jobs exercise package installation, tests, and no-GPU behavior. A hosted Windows CPU runner is not evidence of Windows NVIDIA support.

AMD ROCm and Windows NVIDIA CUDA/OpenCL remain unvalidated for this candidate. Intel OpenCL evidence is limited to the one Linux device listed above. Other probes are available for early testing but are not represented as validated hardware support.

Reproducing a real-hardware run

Use a clean public commit so the tested source is recoverable. Replace BACKEND with cuda, metal, rocm, or opencl.

git clone https://github.com/tkcaccia/gpuinfo.git
cd gpuinfo
git rev-parse HEAD
R CMD build .
shasum -a 256 gpuinfo_*.tar.gz
R CMD INSTALL gpuinfo_*.tar.gz
Rscript tools/validate-hardware.R BACKEND | tee validation-output.txt

A successful run ends with VALIDATION PASSED. Preserve the full output and record the package commit, operating system, architecture, GPU model, driver, runtime, memory, provider, and job identifier. Cloud instances must be terminated after collecting the evidence; merely disconnecting from or stopping a billable GPU machine may leave charges running.

What counts as validation

The project uses three distinct levels of testing:

  1. Parser fixtures verify that representative command output is interpreted correctly. They do not prove hardware support.
  2. CPU-only continuous integration verifies portability, installation, and safe behavior when accelerators are absent. It does not validate a GPU.
  3. A real-hardware run must enumerate the device and expected backend and must complete tools/validate-hardware.R successfully. Only these runs are added to the validation evidence returned by hardware_info().

This separation keeps release claims auditable and allows later package versions to promote AMD, Intel, or Windows GPU support only after the relevant hardware run passes.